Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Patricia FrustaceMember
We work with Non-Profit HR and they have been excellent collaborators.
Patricia
Patricia Frustace (she/her)
Senior Director Career Advancement and Population Health Programs
Main: 202.776.0544 |
Mobile:202.731.2670Web: |
Email: [email protected]2021 L Street NW #900, Washington, DC 20036
From: Health Research Alliance – Do Not Reply <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2025 2:18 PM
To: Patricia Frustace <[email protected]>
Subject: New post in Info: “Market analysis of nonprofit compensation”September 19, 2025 at 6:34 pm in reply to: Policy on uploading grant proposals to ChatGPT (or other AI tools) #15808Patricia FrustaceMemberWe do have a few related policies. Happy to chat about them. In a nutshell we’ve chosen to purchase a product that is self contained as it relates specifically to our content. Meaning none of our content is shared back to the provider for broader learning and
use.Get Outlook for iOSSeptember 16, 2025 at 9:48 am in reply to: Are you interested in showcasing your organization’s funding priorities? #15775Patricia FrustaceMemberASH would welcome being included as well!
Patricia
Patricia Frustace (she/her)
Senior Director Career Advancement and Population Health Programs
Main: 202.776.0544 |
Mobile:202.731.2670Web: |
Email: [email protected]2021 L Street NW #900, Washington, DC 20036
From: Health Research Alliance – Do Not Reply <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2025 9:12 AM
To: Patricia Frustace <[email protected]>
Subject: New reply in Info: “Are you interested in showcasing your organization’s funding priorities?”Patricia FrustaceMemberWe do not allow for IDC in our grant programs but we do allow fringe with salary for our programs. I am interested to hear what others are willing to share.
We’ve been asked to reconsider but have not begun discussing what the impact and corresponding recommendations would be.
Patricia
Patricia Frustace (she/her)
Senior Director Career Advancement and Population Health Programs
Main: 202.776.0544 | Mobile: 202.731.2670
Web: | Email: [email protected]
2021 L Street NW #900, Washington, DC 20036
Patricia FrustaceMemberHi Kavita,
We are similar to the below as well. We consider natural breaks in score, available budget, programmatic priorities, applicant potential to contribute to the field (this extends our consideration beyond an assessment of the proposed research). Further, we have a whole file (holistic) review component to our review as well, particularly for our trainee and student level awards. We almost always have more meritorious proposals than available funds.
We have 20 different award programs so # of awards and $ available as well as funding % vary from program to program.
As a philosophical aside, my observation of study section behaviors seems to demonstrate that this is a far more human and therefore subjective effort than most think. I’ve seen single comments change the direction of the scoring, I’ve seen the same application have significantly different scores when considered within two separate study sections, I’ve seen how “who” is in the room can transform the culture of a study section.
Patricia
Patricia Frustace (she/her)
Senior Director Career Advancement and Population Health Programs
Main: 202.776.0544 | Mobile: 202.731.2670
Web: | Email: [email protected]
2021 L Street NW #900, Washington, DC 20036
-
AuthorPosts